Dyslexia is not just about reading , or even language . It ’s about something more fundamental : How much can the brain adapt to what it has just observed ? People with dyslexia typically have less brain plasticity than those without dyslexia , two recent studies have notice .

Though the studies appraise the great unwashed ’s brain body process in two different ways and while performing different tasks , researchers at the Hebrew University of Israel , reporting ineLife , and researchers from MIT , report inNeuron , both found that dyslexics ’ brain did not accommodate as much to repeat stimulation , include spoken words , musical notes , and confront .

Both exercise set of researchers found that hoi polloi with dyslexia more promptly forget late events . This type of storage is call ensuant or unquestioning memory , and includes anything you did n’t know you needed to remember when it happened . Because of how quickly their implicit memory fades , dyslexics ' brainpower do n’t adapt as much after reading or hearing something repeatedly — which is perhaps why it is hard for their brains to process the words they read .

iStock

Your brain in general benefit from repetition because it relates a stimulus to what you ’ve already experienced — like a promissory note you have heard before or a aspect you ’ve seen . Researchers can see this by measuring brain response with electroencephalography ( EEG ) , a noninvasive direction of measuring electrical activity in the brain by attaching electrodes to your scalp . Measured by EEG , people ’s mentality response decrease when they ’ve heard a duplicate note . The brainiac get more effective with repetition : It knows something about the greenback already , so it does n’t have to mold as hard to capture all of its detail . It ’s a bit like when you see an animal and recognize right away that it ’s a frankfurter without have to catalogue all of the thing that make it a dog . Your brain is efficient at recognizing frank because you ’ve seen them before .

SHORTER MEMORIES AND LESS ADAPTABILITY

In the Hebrew University cogitation , led by Merav Ahissar , investigator give content a musical task : The researchers played two dissimilar notes and asked which was higher . Previous research has found that mass do better on this task when one of the notes is a repeat of a bank bill they ’ve learn of late . But Ahissar found that people with dyslexia did not benefit as much from the repeating . When a feel was restate only three second after the " anchor " tone , they got some benefit , but not after nine seconds had elapsed . And when Ahissar ’s team measured dyslectic people ’s brain responses with EEG , their brain responses did n’t decrease . Their brain did n’t get any more efficient — they were less adaptable .

The MIT survey , led by John Gabrieli , found standardized results through a unlike experimentation . Gabrieli used functional magnetic resonance imaging ( fMRI ) to measure the great unwashed ’s brain activity by measuring changes in parentage rate of flow in their wit . Instead of asking people to discriminate between musical notes , Gabrieli ’s team simply presented mass with repeated thing , admit spoken Book , written Good Book , faces , and rough-cut objects like table or chair . During this task , dyslexic people ’s neural action present less adaptation .

“ It was a big surprisal for us , ” Gabrieli tells mental_floss , “ because hoi polloi with reading disorderliness do n’t typically have any problem with faces or objects . ” Next , Gabrieli is curious to look into whether the result of dyslexia on brain malleability are set to hearing and vision , or whether they also extend to other gumption like touch and olfactory perception .

Together , these study establish a secure understanding of how dyslexia puzzle out , and because the two studies establish the same result with different methods , their results are more convincing than a exclusive study alone . But they also raise a fresh question : Why is dyslexia mainly noticeable in understand if it move other type of storage as well ?

READING IS NEW—AND HARD, FROM THE BRAIN’S PERSPECTIVE

One hypothesis is that recitation is but a difficult task . “ We have a recollective evolutionary history in our brain for recognize object , recognizing faces , " Gabrieli point out . That ’s not the case for reading material . “ There ’s hardly a grown challenge for brain malleability than learning to read . " More evolutionary clock time has allowed the brain to evolve redundant room of accomplishing the same thing . Perhaps hoi polloi with dyslexia are better at compensating for the store spread for recognize faces and talk words because the wit has more alternating pathways for these unconscious process than it does for study .

Both Ahissar and Gabrieli are most excited that this inquiry open up up new ways of study — and perhaps someday treating — dyslexia . If dyslexia is a shape of interpretation and language only , as antecedently think , “ we can not study it in animal , ” Ahissar tells mental_floss . On the other hand , if it ’s a experimental condition of Einstein plasticity , we can — in fact , plasticity has been extensively studied in animal , and neuroscientists hump a lot about it .

Someday , Gabrieli read , it may even be possible to develop drugs that would handle dyslexia by promoting learning ability malleability , although research worker would have to be careful both much and ethically .

“ We ca n’t imagine originate a drug that would enhance spoken language immediately — that ’s too complicated , " he notes . " But brain plasticity is something that neuroscientists are pass water awing advance on . ”