If you know in the U.S. , it ’s probable that you eat a lot of GMO food , and there isplenty of scientific grounds that these foods are perfectly safe . Still , many consumers desire GMO foods to be judge , simply because they want to know whether their food is the product of genetic engineering or not .
get into California ’s Proposition 37 , which would require stores and marketer to pronounce GMO foods . Already there is a giant inclination of fellowship ( mostly outside California ) who are contribute massively to the campaign to stop the labeling . Here are thebiggest contributor to the “ No on 37 ” campaign , who each donated more than $ 1 million . The list reads like a who ’s who of the US food and factory farm industries :
MONSANTO troupe
$ 4,208,000.00
E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO .
$ 4,025,200.00
PEPSICO , INC .
$ 1,716,300.00
BASF PLANT SCIENCE
$ 1,642,300.00
BAYER CROPSCIENCE
$ 1,618,400.00
DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC
$ 1,184,800.00
NESTLE USA , INC .
$ 1,169,400.00
COCA - COLA NORTH AMERICA
$ 1,164,400.00
CONAGRA FOODS
$ 1,076,700.00
SYNGENTA CORPORATION
$ 821,300.00
KELLOGG COMPANY
$ 632,500.00
GENERAL MILLS , INC .
$ 519,401.17
HERSHEY COMPANY
$ 395,100.00
THE J.M. SMUCKER COMPANY
$ 388,000.00
COUNCIL FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY INFORMATION
$ 375,000.00
GROCERY MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION
HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION
$ 374,300.00
BIMBO BAKERIES USA
$ 338,300.00
OCEAN SPRAY CRANBERRIES , INC .
$ 301,553.21
PINNACLE FOODS GROUP LLC
$ 266,100.00
I ’ve always been strongly in favor of GMOs , largely because they can head to more sustainable farms and healthy solid food . And I can understand why companionship fear that GMO labeling will alarm likely emptor , since some the great unwashed have a knee - jerk electronegative reaction to genetic engineering . Still , it does n’t help GMO makers ’ cause when they are so nakedly fight the idea of informing the populace about what is a GMO and what is n’t . TheSan Francisco Chronicle reports :
About 70 to 80 per centum of process foods sold in the United States are made with genetically mastermind ingredient , including Zea mays , soybeans , boodle beet and cotton oil . Many of these crops have been genetically alter in the lab to make them more resistant to plague and invasive weeds , reducing the need for chemical pesticide and make the crops well suited to endure menses of regretful conditions . Genetically modified crops also significantly increase per - acre yield , reduce the requirement for farmland .
If the California measure passes , processed genetically engineered food for thought Cartesian product would include the words “ partly produced with genetic technology ” on either the front or back label . For whole foods , such as fresh corn whiskey and salmon , grocers would be required to have a sign on the ledge . Manufacturers and stores would have 18 calendar month to make the variety . product such as alcohol , most meats , eggs and dairy would be nontaxable .
The Chron also quotes UCLA molecular life scientist Bob Goldberg , who tell the newspaper , “ Bioengineered crop are the safest crop in the world . We ’ve been testing them for 40 years . They ’re like the Model T Ford . There is not one credible scientist working on this that would call it dangerous . ”
This makes it even more bizarre that company are balking at GMO label being included along with every other piece of health selective information on nutrient , like ingredient and nutritionary information . Again , resisting the labels makes the GMO industry look like they have something to shroud , which in the end undermines their stated finish of making Americans more prosperous with the fact that we ’ve been eat up GMOs for decade .
Science
Daily Newsletter
Get the good tech , scientific discipline , and acculturation news in your inbox day by day .
News from the futurity , delivered to your present .
Please choose your hope newssheet and submit your email to upgrade your inbox .
