Apple ’s newMacBook Pro 16 with M4 Prois not carrying the old idiom , “ what ’s old is fresh again . ” just put , what ’s honest-to-god is sure-enough , what ’s new is unexampled , and it ’s bring all the luggage from retiring generations . The MacBook Pro 16 with M4 Pro sports the same look and chassiswe’ve visualize for the last three years . There ’s an existential quality to thelatest MacBooks . You know they ’ll be powerful . You know they ’ll last you a good , long while . You know it so well that you may struggle to justify the upgrade .

But if you were ride there wondering which is better , the M4 or the M4 Pro chip , the latter is leagues more herculean . The M4 Pro by itself is capable of vie against desktop - grade CPUs in some of our tests . provide is a breeze , and with the 20 - core GPU variant , it ’s perfectly up to of maxing out several of the games available to Apple ’s desktop ecosystem ( which , despite Apple ’s play initiative , is still paltry compare to PC ) . The new big MacBook is better on its own than the M3 Max from last year . Plus , the M4 Pro has access code to the High Power Mode options previously only available on the Max chips , allowing good control of how much oomph you grant your MacBook .

MacBook Pro 16 2024

Macbook Pro 16 Laptop

© Photo: Kyle Barr / Gizmodo

The MacBook Pro 16 with M4 Pro proves that power is itself a feature , but I ’m so banal of this soma it necessitate away from the promise .

Pros

bunco game

Macbook Pro Rendering 1

© Photo: Kyle Barr / Gizmodo

For all that call power , this is still an expensive laptop computer . Our 16 - inch M4 MacBook Pro review unit include the M4 Pro with 14 CPU cores and 20 GPU cores , plus 48 GB of RAM and 2 TB of warehousing . All totaled up , this configuration would set you back $ 3,500 . The low - end M4 Max configuration starts at that same Mary Leontyne Price . The base model at this screen size is $ 2,500 , already a princely sum . equate that to gamy - end PCs with a discrete GPU , and you could find excellent gaming laptop like theLenovo Legion Pro 7ifor hundreds of dollars less . I would die for a MacBook with a keyboard like the ones you see on the late , bully gaming laptops , but there ’s no such luck .

And yet , the MacBook Pro 16 is a productivity brute , beat the competition in all the benchmark tests except for graphics . It ’s so alike to last year ’s that I ’m start up to inquire what other manipulation case there could mayhap be for Mac , specially for M4 Pro or M4 Max fleck . Sure , there’sControl , Frostpunk 2 , now on Mac natively , and finally , Cyberpunk 2077is rolling into the station follow 2025.The M4 Pro can game , but you ’ll be depressed if you defy look at Steam library ’s Mac compatibility .

Even with the promise of more succeeding claim , gaming ca n’t be your one heavy intellect to upgrade to the more expensive Mac . Apple hop that anybody still using a MacBook Pro and an Intel Chip from before 2020 will sense enticed to drop it for an M - Series MacBook . If you suit the bill and you ’ve been eyeball an rising slope , this is the best one yet . Just do n’t assume Apple Intelligence will change your man . It ca n’t possibly do so until 2025 , if ever .

Apple Macbook Pro 2024 09

© Photo: Adriano Contreras / Gizmodo

MacBook Pro 16 2024 Review: Performance

Since this yr ’s figure is so similar to the MacBook Pro with M3 , the Pro with M2 , and the M1 Pro and Max blueprint from 2021 , performance really matters . The M4 Pro is a powerhouse that managed to beat last twelvemonth ’s M3 Max in many of our tests . Even more than that , it try better than I had thought it would .

The M4 Pro is a huge stair up from what you get if you opt for the cheapest MacBook Pro 14 . Benchmark resolution clearly beat out the root M4 chip as dramatically as the M3 Max did to the bottom - end M3 from last year . In Geekbench 6 , the M4 was 67 points better in single - kernel than the MacBook Pro 14 and close to 7,800 points in multi - core configurations . The M4 Pro rack up one of our best times for our Handbrake tests , transcoding a 4 cat valium video recording into 1080p .

See MacBook Pro 16 at Amazon

Macbook Pro 16 Gaming 1

© Photo: Kyle Barr / Gizmodo

It also scored above or at par with the M3 Max MacBook Pro 16 in most tests , save for graphics - specific chore . The CPU could finish our Blender test , where we force it to fork up a picture of a BMW in one minute and 34 seconds , just two s slower than the M3 Max .

compare to an Intel Core i9 - 14900 K , the M4 Pro baffle it by around 800 points in single - magnetic core and 1,900 in multi - core options with Geekbench 6 . A desktop microcomputer with a distinct GPU may still win out for the sake of rendering tests , but if you compare it to the Intel Core i9 - 14900HX in a swelled laptop computer like theRazer Blade 16 , the M4 Pro wins by more than 200 point in time in multi - core tests .

Apple seems to think the M4 Pro is a gaming - ready chip . I run it with several secret plan and obtain that , yes , it ’s perfectly adequate to of playing ask titles with relative ease . Apple likes to mention the ironware - accelerated electron beam tracing financial backing on M4 . I tried theMystremake , and at full solution and shaft tracing , I was at stable , sub-60 FPS framerates , although the glitchy ray - traced lighting on water surfaces routinely tanked performance .

Apple Macbook Pro 2024 02

© Photo: Adriano Contreras / Gizmodo

Resident Evil 4could proffer between 100 and 120 FPS at eminent scene at a 1920 by 1200 resoluteness . If you max out the firmness , you may expect between 45 and 60 FPS , which you may boost by increasing the MetalFX upscaling from “ timbre . ” It ’s the samestory withDeath Stranding : Director ’s Cut , with FPS that never dipped despite the light beam tracingin the setting .

InBaldur ’s Gate III , I could get more than 90 FPS indoors and between 60 and 70 FPS outdoors , though at a lower - than - native resolution . locomote up to the covert ’s 3456 by 2234 solvent want enabling AMD FSR or else dial back the configurations to get playable framerates . You ca n’t look much more from a computer without a distinct GPU , but it bodes well for any future titles coming to Mac if and when they do .

Let ’s fall in it down . The power - per - satisfying - inch is why you should opt for the M4 Pro over the base 14 - inch M4 models . You should still look towards a quality PC if you want a fluid play computer . If gambling is lowly to your Mac usance , The MacBook Pro 16 is at least capable of handling whatever is thrown its way .

Tina Romero Instagram

MacBook Pro 16 2024 Review: Build Quality and Display

The notch is still there , the bane of my Mac screen experience , the eye of Sauron that Apple refuses to topple . I do n’t need a cutout on my display . I desire it gone , but that ’s not in the cards for this MacBook refresh . It ’s another hard oral contraceptive pill to accept because the mini - LED “ Liquid Retina XDR ” presentation is already a character blind ; I would desire Apple to maximise all the CRT screen genuine estate it can . I understand some people do n’t enjoy the iPhone ’s active island , but surely it ’s a better option than what we ’ve gone through with Apple ’s laptop , proper ? Besides , a novel screen may finally have in mind a modulation to OLED . guess the iPad Pro ’s tandem OLED on a MacBook . hail on , attest it with me .

There ’s now an pick among the MacBook Pro 14 and 16 for the Cupertino society ’s tout “ nano - texture ” to reduce reflexion and glare . Apple said it sent me a MacBook Pro 14 with the nano - texture and the 16 model without it . However , I found my 16 model seemed more matte than the 14 . The departure was obvious side - by - side with the M3 MacBook Pro .

However , the raw , higher brightness on the 16 - inch exhibit did more to offset issues than a texture .   In direct lightness through a window , I could honestly not distinguish much of a difference between one with it and one without . Compared to theIPS LCD MacBook Air 15 , both the Taiwanese - LEDs did a good job reducing glare . I would suggest saving your money and opting for the regular screen . Perhaps doubly so since Apple still want you to purchase a $ 19 polishing fabric for the nano - grain . Our advice : do n’t .

Dummy

It ’s still a pretty laptop computer , to be sure , and in my feeling , it ’s prettier without nano - grain . The blacks are not going to have the inky quality of OLED ( and perhaps we might finally see that OLED Mac in 2025 ) , but they ’re deep enough to palpate fulfil when gaming or streaming . As for the few other pocket-sized change , there ’s a novel rising slope to the port survival .

I still experience satisfied with the I / O on the Pro models . There ’s the SD carte du jour proofreader , four USB - one C port , an HDMI port , and Apple ’s proprietary MagSafe 3 . All the versions of the MacBook Pro with M4 Pro and M4 Max , alongside the M4 Pro - poweredMac miniskirt , now include Thunderbolt 5 instead of 4 . Thunderbolt 4 crest out at 40 Gbps bandwidth speeds . The upgrade offers 80 Gbps basis bandwidth mental ability and a soap of 120 speeds with Bandwidth Boost , though the higher speed would crest receiving information to 40 Gbps . you could still stick with the MagSafe 3 courser in the box , but anybody with big power bricks with a USB - C terminal can expect to max out on charging speed .

Despite the big promises , you ca n’t support multiple 8 K monitors with a MacBook Pro . The M4 Pro chip can do the full 3456 by 2234 closure on the Pro ’s showing while support two international monitors at 6 K and 60 Hz refresh pace . you could do a 4 K up to 144 Hz through HDMI plus a 6 K at 60 Hz , but you ’ll lose out on your MacBook blind . If you require more , you take to drop extra dosh on the M4 Max with reinforcement for three 6 super C monitors through Thunderbolt and a 4 K show through HDMI .

James Cameron Underwater

Even with the move to Thunderbolt 5 , some upgrades seem mysteriously lacking . There ’s still no WiFi 7 living ; or else , it ’s stuck with WiFi 6E. It ’s not a dealbreaker , but it ’s strange to see Apple accept the diametrical tack when other laptops are jumping up to WiFi 7 long before Thunderbolt 5 .

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 Review: Battery Life

Macs are have it off for their stamp battery life story , which is as rightful with the M4 models as with the M3 , M2 , and M1 chips . These laptop last for a farsighted time . Apple promise 24 hr of video recording cyclosis and 17 hour of wireless internet browsing on laptops with the M4 Pro . Our tests found the MacBook Pro 16 was close to those metrics , but of track , you wo n’t get 17 - 60 minutes runtimes since you wo n’t just be using a $ 3,500 laptop to browse the internet .

In our stamp battery tests , where we ran the laptop on a 24 - 60 minutes YouTube video at the humiliated potential brightness , the 16 - column inch MacBook Pro was at 61 % after 12 hour . It only reach 50 % at the 14 - hour fool . As you might expect , it accept another 12 time of day to die completely . It has better length of service than its 14 - in counterpart with M4 , which sit down at 50 % after 12 hours on the same test .

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 Review: Verdict

You might be enquire why I have n’t note Apple Intelligence once since the beginning of this review . Simply put , it does not change how you utilise your Mac . We ’ve covered mickle of that already , and if you want more , read myMacBook Pro 14 review . If you do n’t have an M - series Mac or the latest iPhones or iPads , you are not miss much as it presently stand . During our reassessment , Apple pushed out developer betas for macOS Sequoia 15.2 , offering the ChatGPT integration that work with the retool Siri . To sum it up , I discover it did n’t bring anything to the Mac experience . Sequoia is already a quality update , and I ’d much rather utilize iPhone mirroring than plug command prompt into ChatGPT through Siri .

The M4 Chip has a good 38 TOPS nervous engine than the M3 , M2 , or M1 chips . Our Geekbench AI bench mark show that the M4 scores are nearly 14,000 points higher than the score of the M3 . However , you have to commemorate that the NPU does n’t do much of the intensive AI tasks . The NPU is built for background AI . Anything that requires more juice is belike plow by Apple Intelligence ’s much - hype private swarm computing . If you ’re an AI developer , you already know you care more about the qualities of the GPU .

Beyond all that , the MacBook Pro 16 with M4 Pro feels like a beast , thrumming with baron , and you have to drop a flying lizard ’s hoard to use it . Even if it romp strong - as - hell performance for that price , the kind of professional who needs that power would have to have a conversation between themselves and whatever god they idolise before cast that amount of money on a singular machine . Just ensure you may live with this chassis . I know I could , but part of me is hope for something well .

Anker Solix C1000 Bag

AppleMacBooks

Daily Newsletter

Get the best technical school , scientific discipline , and finish news in your inbox daily .

News from the futurity , deliver to your nowadays .

You May Also Like

Naomi 3

Sony 1000xm5

NOAA GOES-19 Caribbean SAL

Ballerina Interview

Tina Romero Instagram

Dummy

James Cameron Underwater

Anker Solix C1000 Bag

Oppo Find X8 Ultra Review

Best Gadgets of May 2025

Steam Deck Clair Obscur Geforce Now

Breville Paradice 9 Review