It ’s probably not surprising that a stiff threat to the survival of civilisation , possibly the entire human race , attract seriously unhinged theories . However , we are not quite quick for the theory aliens are breed hybrids of themselves and humanity to allow us to subsist ruinous global warming . Although you may chance almost any freaky possibility in a Youtube television somewhere , this one is distinguished by having been promoted by a prof at one of the world ’s most prestigious universities , albeit in Korean studies rather than space biology .
Back in 2012,Dr Young - hae Chigave a lecture at the “ Alien Abduction and Environmental Issues Conference ” , because evidently there are enough people who think the two are relate to reserve one . The talking was put onYoutubein 2014 . It did n’t pull a lot of aid until last class , when Chi unsuccessfully requested the Oxford Union host a debate on the topic .
TheOxford Studentheard about this and question Chi and now the whole worldly concern is agog .
Chi starts by citing the impression of Dr David Jacobs , an " abduction researcher " in the US , that aliens are abducting human being for the use of creating a intercrossed backwash to colonize Earth . It ’s a step up from the storymarijuana contains foreign DNA , and unlike that one is apparently propose seriously , rather than being a put-on . Being in contradiction to everything we bang about the physics of space locomotion and the workings of desoxyribonucleic acid are minor matters .
Chi accepts the abduction , and hybridization , as material , but has a unlike account for why aliens would do this . He notes the absence of abduction reports before World War II and concludes this is a late phenomenon .
Aliens pop out capture innocent people on derelict backroads and stealing their desoxyribonucleic acid , not because they wish to supervene upon us , Chi thinks , but to help us . The foreigner espy the damage we are inflicting on our planet and fearfulness we will not pull round . Hybridization could be our only Leslie Townes Hope .
There is a particular strangeness to listen to Chi ’s talk . The summary he gives of the skill of mood change , and the refusal of certain regime to take it badly , is generally an accurate account of the province of knowledge at the time . Seeing these mixed in with claim so far from reality creates a uncanny disagreement .
It ’s distressful to see someone who clearly translate the science of mood variety propound theories at least as sappy as the one that blamewarmer temperature on consistence heatand sea level rise onrocks falling into ocean .
However , Chi ’s talk is a bang-up example of the way conspiracy theory have together unrelated facts as being link . Meanwhile , the theoriser never turn back to turn over questions like : If technologically higher-ranking outlander want to salve us , why have n’t they just left program for non - polluting vitality systems lying around ?
